Card art & culture

The 10 Ugliest Charizard Cards of All Time

Charizard sells whatever is printed on it, which is exactly why some of the art is this bad. Ten misses, and the house decisions behind them.

Stakd Team3 min read
Three cards from the article, fanned out: Charizard GX SM60 in front, Charizard V 17/172 and Charizard 25/185 behind.

Charizard sells no matter what is printed on the card. That is the whole reason a list like this is possible: an artist can miss completely, and the card still moves, because the name on it does the work.

Ten Charizards that did not land. None of this is aimed at the illustrators, who were mostly working inside a house style they did not choose. The interesting part is that the misses cluster, and the clusters have dates.

10. Charizard GX SM60

Charizard GX SM60: a flat promo card with Charizard posed against a red and blue split background.
Charizard GX SM60

A promo, and it looks like one. Flat colour, a generic pose, and a background that is two colours meeting in the middle because something had to be there.

9. Charizard V 17/172

Charizard V 17/172: a 3D-rendered orange Charizard breathing fire against a black background.
Charizard V 17/172

The cleanest of the three 3D renders on this list, which is not a compliment. It is competent, symmetrical, and completely without a point of view. Nothing is happening.

8. Charizard 25/185

Charizard 25/185: a 3D-rendered Charizard standing beside the trainer Leon in front of a stadium crowd.
Charizard 25/185

Same rendering problem, plus a human. Leon is drawn in one style and Charizard in another, and standing them next to each other makes both look wrong.

7. Charizard 10/078, Pokémon GO

Charizard 10/078 from the Pokémon GO set: a 3D-rendered Charizard flying over a photorealistic city street, with the Pokémon GO logo in the corner.
Charizard 10/078, Pokémon GO set

This is the moment the card game started rendering instead of drawing. The Charizard is a 3D model, the city underneath is nearly photographic, and the two never agree on what kind of image they are in.

6. Radiant Charizard 20/159

Radiant Charizard 20/159, illustrated by Kouki Saitou: a black and dark grey Charizard with red wing membranes, against a white snowy background.
Radiant Charizard 20/159, illus. Kouki Saitou

A black Charizard on a white background is a bold call, and on a phone screen it mostly reads as a silhouette. The Radiant treatment gave a handful of Pokémon a recoloured shiny look, and Charizard is the one where the recolour lost the most.

5. Charizard EX 11/106

Charizard EX 11/106: an extreme close-up of Charizard's face and neck, cropped so tightly that the body is gone.
Charizard EX 11/106

Cropped so close that the Pokémon stops being a Pokémon and becomes a texture. You can count the scales and you cannot tell what it is doing.

4. M Charizard EX 69/106

M Charizard EX 69/106: a black Mega Charizard X behind large katakana, on a background of yellow and blue energy streaks.
M Charizard EX 69/106

There is a good card in here somewhere. The problem is that the katakana, the energy streaks, the lightning and the dragon are all fighting for the same space, and none of them wins.

3. Charizard G 20/147

Charizard G 20/147, illustrated by Wataru Kawahara: a small Charizard against a dark blue and purple background, with Charon's portrait in the corner.
Charizard G 20/147, illus. Wataru Kawahara

The first of two Team Galactic Charizards, and the worse of them, because the Charizard is smaller and the background is a flat dark blue. Put it beside number two and you are not looking at two bad drawings, you are looking at one bad template used twice.

2. Charizard G LV.X 143/147

Charizard G LV.X 143/147, illustrated by Wataru Kawahara: a muddy brown and grey Charizard breathing fire, with a small circular portrait of Charon in the corner.
Charizard G LV.X 143/147, illus. Wataru Kawahara

This is Team Galactic's Charizard, and the era's rule was that a trainer's face got pasted into a circle in the corner of the art. It turns every card into a passport photo with a dragon behind it.

The palette does the rest. Brown, grey and a dull orange, on a card that is supposed to be about fire.

1. Charizard, Expedition 40/165

Charizard 40/165 from Expedition, illustrated by Hironobu Sugiyama: a flat orange Charizard with wide stiff wings, on a pale yellow card with a dotted e-Reader strip down the left edge.
Charizard 40/165 from Expedition, illus. Hironobu Sugiyama

The wings are the problem. They are spread flat and stiff, closer to a kite than to an animal, and the pale card does nothing to help. The dotted strip running down the left edge is the e-Reader code, a format that lasted about two years and left every card of the era looking like it had a barcode stapled to it.

What the misses have in common

Three of these ten are 3D renders, and they arrive together in the same few years. Two more come from the era that pasted a trainer's portrait into the corner of every card. That is five out of ten explained not by a bad artist but by a house decision that aged badly.

Charizard does not need the art to be good. That is exactly why some of it is not.

The commercial lesson underneath the joke is real: on a card this famous, demand comes from the name, so the artwork is the one variable nobody is forced to get right.

For the opposite case, where the illustration is the entire reason the card is wanted, see the most amazing Pokémon cards ever printed.

Stakd tracks what your Charizards are actually worth, including the ones you would rather not look at.

Track what your collection is really worth

Stakd turns your cards, Funko Pops and LEGO sets into a valued portfolio, with AI grading, live market prices and profit tracking.

Download Stakd

Back to the blog